Instant Checkmate
Criminal-record and social-profile search option.
View RecordsEvaluate a background check by identity matching, source detail and correction support, then fix the gaps that prevent a report from answering your actual question.
| Reader task | Source that fits the task | What not to assume |
|---|---|---|
| Confirm the text or disposition of one court case | The court or clerk that holds that case; obtain the filed docket entry, order or judgment when exact wording matters. | A broad screening report may summarize or aggregate the event and is not the filed court document. |
| Review your own FBI identity history | The FBI Identity History Summary for your own rap sheet; a direct request is $18 and uses current fingerprints. | The FBI says it does not provide name checks for this product, and an FBI summary is not every state/local record source. |
| Use a third-party report for an employment decision | A consumer report used under the FTC/EEOC employment-screening rules, with the required notice, permission and adverse-action steps. | “More data” does not remove FCRA duties or guarantee that every jurisdiction is covered. |
| Fact-check a screening report about you | Identify the reporting company actually used and use the CFPB consumer reporting company resources to request or dispute the relevant report. | A different company’s report can have different sources and is not a clean substitute for the report that drove the decision. |
Define the decision first: one case, local history, employment screening, licensing, tenancy, or self-review. A product can be accurate within its scope and still be the wrong tool for the question.
Ask which courts, states, federal sources or other repositories are actually searched. A “national” label does not by itself identify the underlying public-record coverage or update timing.
Name-only matches can create false positives or misses. Compare date of birth and other lawful identifiers where the official source exposes them, and use the underlying court record when a consequential hit needs confirmation.
CFPB background-screening guidance emphasizes maximum possible accuracy and procedures that prevent reporting duplicative, expunged, sealed or otherwise restricted public-record information. A usable screening process needs a way to challenge an error, not just a search button.
The FTC/EEOC guidance says a covered employer gives a written stand-alone notice that background information may be used and obtains written permission.
If the employer may reject, terminate, reassign or otherwise act adversely because of a consumer report, it first gives the person a copy of the report and the FCRA Summary of Rights so the information can be reviewed.
The employer provides an adverse-action notice that identifies the reporting company and explains the right to dispute the report and obtain an additional free copy within the federal time window described by the FTC.
The FTC specifically notes that states and municipalities can regulate background reports or their employment use. Federal compliance is not a promise that every local rule has been satisfied.
Ask which consumer reporting company supplied the information and request the report about you. Do not start by purchasing several unrelated searches.
Record the court, case number, disposition date and jurisdiction shown in the report. If the report does not identify the source clearly, ask the reporting company what source supports the item.
Use the court or repository that owns the record. Look for dismissals, corrected identifiers, sealed or expunged status, duplicate entries, and disposition language that the screening summary may have misstated.
Provide the specific error and the official documentation that supports the correction. If the issue is in an FBI Identity History Summary, the FBI provides its own challenge process rather than a consumer-report dispute channel.
This page does not rank providers, claim testing that was not performed, or endorse a commercial service. A background check is more useful when its purpose, jurisdiction, source coverage, identity-matching method, legal use and correction path match the decision being made. Those attributes can differ even when two products use similar marketing labels.